nuclear energy option in Nyasaland

What are the pros and cons of nuclear energy for Nyasaland? Is it an option in the medium to LR, especially considering its landlocked nature and the drying rivers (hence dwindling reliability of hydro-energy)? Despite being a peaceful nation, it's trivial to note that Nyasaland's erratic energy sources puts a bar on serious investors. Could nuclear energy be i(u)nfeasible or harmful?

Comments

  1. Acacia29 November 2009 at 14:18

    um are you pro-colonialism? harking back to our non-independent days? last time i heard, we were a free country called Malawi.
    having said that its true, it would be good to do some research and get evidence on the negative impact of erratic power supply on foreign investment.
    surely instead of the melodramatic solution of nuclear, we could work on making sure our rivers do not dry up?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Name: Mfumu Saka30 November 2009 at 07:19

    great comment!
    Or even trying to see how we could increase electricity generation from water, and wind?
    But how does nuclear energy become so questionnable? apart from the huge initial outlays, wouldnt it be a reliable source in the LR?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alick Mjuma Nyasulu7 December 2009 at 21:47

    I think we have not fully exploited hydro-energy and utmost our planning has been short term in as far as energy policy is concerned! the waters of lake Mlawi have not been fully exploited! I am abit sckeptical with nuclear energy...its environmental risks vis-a-vis nuclear waste disposal given that Malawi has not yet gone fully to appreciate environmental protection!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

📊 Critical Appraisal of the IPOR 2025 Pre-Election Survey: Coincidence or Constructed Optics?

  By Mfumusaka  The release of the  IPOR 2025 pre-election survey , just days into campaign season, has generated both interest and concern. While opinion polling plays a legitimate role in democratic processes, the  substance, structure, and timing  of this particular survey raise important questions that merit closer scrutiny. 1. Too Many Convenient Coincidences The timing of the findings seems almost choreographed to match recent political developments. Just days after a controversial choice of running mate by the  Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)  triggered widespread ridicule, that same party is suddenly projected to  lead nationally with 43% , and to command  37% in the North , a region where it has historically struggled outside unusual moments like 2009. The  United Transformation Movement (UTM) , which recently rejected an alliance with the DPP and remained independent, is shown  collapsing to just 5% , despite having sec...
Read more

Delegates’ voting behaviour: Elusive, but just for Now

Image
    Greenwell Matchaya, PhD One of the most frustrating things for any investor is being unable to know the possible returns of his/her investment with some level of certainty. Similarly, for a political investor/politician it can be frustrating to devout so much effort in a competition where the voter behaviour is unknown, because doing so would easily lead to wastage of resources or in other words, would limit gains per dollar invested. While voter behaviour is complex and often elusive, when the same or similar voters vote for candidates over a number of times, it is easier to demystify their behaviour. Using known techniques of analysis often taught in elementary statistics, econometrics and mathematics classes, it is possible to study the patterns and derive generalizations or even “theorems” around such behaviour. With advances in machine learning and AI in general, and a good understanding of physiology, sociology, one can torture data or even create some and pr...
Read more

Malawi’s Historic Defamation Ruling: A Test of Responsibility

  By Dr. Greenwell Matchaya, LLB, PhD 17 July 2025   In a major advance for democratic governance and constitutionalism, the High Court of Malawi , sitting as a Constitutional Court , has delivered a landmark ruling striking down Section 200 of the Penal Code , which criminalised defamation. The unanimous judgment , delivered in July 2025 by Justices Chifundo Kachale, Fiona Mwale, and Mzondi Mvula , affirms that the criminalisation of defamation unjustifiably infringes the right to freedom of expression as protected under Section 35 of the Constitution. Importantly, this judgment should not be misread as a dismissal of the importance of dignity and reputation in society. Rather, it is a reaffirmation of constitutional values , chief among them, the right of all citizens to participate in open, informed, and critical public dialogue without fear of criminal sanction. A Legal Milestone: Malawi’s Evolving Defamation Landscape The case was brought by political comme...
Read more