nuclear energy option in Nyasaland

What are the pros and cons of nuclear energy for Nyasaland? Is it an option in the medium to LR, especially considering its landlocked nature and the drying rivers (hence dwindling reliability of hydro-energy)? Despite being a peaceful nation, it's trivial to note that Nyasaland's erratic energy sources puts a bar on serious investors. Could nuclear energy be i(u)nfeasible or harmful?

Comments

  1. Acacia29 November 2009 at 14:18

    um are you pro-colonialism? harking back to our non-independent days? last time i heard, we were a free country called Malawi.
    having said that its true, it would be good to do some research and get evidence on the negative impact of erratic power supply on foreign investment.
    surely instead of the melodramatic solution of nuclear, we could work on making sure our rivers do not dry up?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Name: Mfumu Saka30 November 2009 at 07:19

    great comment!
    Or even trying to see how we could increase electricity generation from water, and wind?
    But how does nuclear energy become so questionnable? apart from the huge initial outlays, wouldnt it be a reliable source in the LR?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alick Mjuma Nyasulu7 December 2009 at 21:47

    I think we have not fully exploited hydro-energy and utmost our planning has been short term in as far as energy policy is concerned! the waters of lake Mlawi have not been fully exploited! I am abit sckeptical with nuclear energy...its environmental risks vis-a-vis nuclear waste disposal given that Malawi has not yet gone fully to appreciate environmental protection!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In defence of the marginalized: The need for sentencing reforms in Malawi’s judicial System

by  Greenwell Matchaya  One reason why we consider (or expected) 1994 as decisive in the economic, legal and social-economic development of the country is because it was supposed to represent a structural break from the past, which was perceived to be associated with a one party rule with its demerits, to political pluralism with possibilities for various branches of government providing checks- and balances to each other, inter alia. It appears however that 21 years later, most of the aspirations that the nation had at the closure of the 1980s have not been realized. The executive and the legislature have not fully embraced truly plural and cooperative forms of organization in that in practice, the legislature is still unicameral, governance of the country is till unitary rather than cooperative ( which is associated with devolution of power to local spheres of government including regions and districts). As such, power is still concentrated at the national sphere...
Read more